<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Reasons Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s Blog Participation Analysis is Flawed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ItsTheROI.com/measuring-campaign-roi/jakob-nielson-mashes-the-number-misses-the-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ItsTheROI.com/measuring-campaign-roi/jakob-nielson-mashes-the-number-misses-the-mark/</link>
	<description>San Francisco Search Engine Optimization Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sue Melin</title>
		<link>http://www.ItsTheROI.com/measuring-campaign-roi/jakob-nielson-mashes-the-number-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Melin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ItsTheROI.com/2006/10/10/jakob-nielson-mashes-the-number-misses-the-mark/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>This is going to sound arrogant, but I wonder, 
if the onlne world mirrors the offline world even somewhat, could it be that there are two groups of people?  Those with something to say, and those with nothing to contribute?
No, but it could be said that there are four groups of people--those with something to say, but no boldness to say it, those with nothing to say, and much boldness, those with no boldness and nothing to say, and finally, those who have something to say, and the guts to say it.  I believe that very 
few people fall into the last category--hopefully, those are the group of people who blog the most.
Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to sound arrogant, but I wonder,<br />
if the onlne world mirrors the offline world even somewhat, could it be that there are two groups of people?  Those with something to say, and those with nothing to contribute?<br />
No, but it could be said that there are four groups of people&#8211;those with something to say, but no boldness to say it, those with nothing to say, and much boldness, those with no boldness and nothing to say, and finally, those who have something to say, and the guts to say it.  I believe that very<br />
few people fall into the last category&#8211;hopefully, those are the group of people who blog the most.<br />
Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
