<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wants To Smoke A Doobie With My Son</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ItsTheROI.com/rant/google-wants-to-smoke-a-doobie-with-my-son/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ItsTheROI.com/rant/google-wants-to-smoke-a-doobie-with-my-son/</link>
	<description>San Francisco Search Engine Optimization Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.ItsTheROI.com/rant/google-wants-to-smoke-a-doobie-with-my-son/comment-page-1/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ItsTheROI.com/?p=58#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>Lol... typical Google-ness. As to Google returning porn in results to kids... that&#039;s not likely something that should be encouraged, givent the high potential for addiction in kids. I was just reading a case, Caputo v Imperial Tobacco, and found this quotation:

&quot;“The plaintiffs claim that the defendants engaged in advertising, media, and public relations campaigns designed to increase their sales, which explicitly or implicitly denied all health-related consequences of consuming their products.  Further, they allege that the defendants targeted children and young adults, as the defendants’ own research indicated that 90% of smokers begin to smoke before age 18 and that it was unlikely for a person to start smoking after the age of 19.”&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol&#8230; typical Google-ness. As to Google returning porn in results to kids&#8230; that&#8217;s not likely something that should be encouraged, givent the high potential for addiction in kids. I was just reading a case, Caputo v Imperial Tobacco, and found this quotation:</p>
<p>&#8220;“The plaintiffs claim that the defendants engaged in advertising, media, and public relations campaigns designed to increase their sales, which explicitly or implicitly denied all health-related consequences of consuming their products.  Further, they allege that the defendants targeted children and young adults, as the defendants’ own research indicated that 90% of smokers begin to smoke before age 18 and that it was unlikely for a person to start smoking after the age of 19.”&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://www.ItsTheROI.com/rant/google-wants-to-smoke-a-doobie-with-my-son/comment-page-1/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ItsTheROI.com/?p=58#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>You got it all wrong! Google advocates eating grass in brownies, smoking  that stuff will cause irreparable damage to your lungs and that is evil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it all wrong! Google advocates eating grass in brownies, smoking  that stuff will cause irreparable damage to your lungs and that is evil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
