The Art Of SEO - The Science Of PPC

  • SEO Secrets
  • Web Content
  • Match Intent
  • User Interface
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Company
    • Team
    • Contact

March 22, 2011 by Jonah Stein Leave a Comment

Google’s Truth or Unintended Consequences

Tweet

SEO Book has a great provided a great summary of how web publication and monetization strategies have been shaped by the intended and unintended consequences of Google’s algorithm changes. While the timeline is a little confusing, the milestones are an excellent summary of how the web has evolved since 1999.

It is not clear if Google is deliberately picking the winners and losers as they react to the world they have wrought or why Richard Rosenblatt seems to come out the winner each time the relevancy team decides what is Truth and who suffers the consequences. As always, Aaron is thoughtful, provocative and one of the few visionaries who can see the opportunities provided by each iteration of Google “truth”.

Google's SEO Cat & Mouse.

Infographic by SEO Book

Filed Under: Google

December 13, 2010 by Jonah Stein 2 Comments

Google Scraping, Cloaking, Diverting Traffic

Tweet

Search for what is work, and you will see a onebox with a Google Answers icon and the “display” or source URL as wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn.

Follow normal search behavior and click the top link or the image in the onebox and you will go to a Google scraper page, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:work instead of going to the Princeton.edu page. In order to view the results on the source page, you would need to click the smaller link that says “Definition in context”.

SERP for what is work

Princeton likely doesn’t care that Google is stealing traffic from WordNet, http://wordnet.princeton.edu/, but other publishers need to know that Google is running its own scraper sites and putting 3rd party content at the top of the page and using it to divert traffic away from the source.

Thanks to David Bayer of Data Banq for pointing this out.

Filed Under: Google, Measuring ROI, Punditry

March 25, 2010 by Jonah Stein Leave a Comment

Your Name Belongs To Google

Tweet

It has been almost two years to the day since I left Alchemist Media to focus on ItsTheROI, yet Google still ranks the Alchemist homepage #2 for my name, “Jonah Stein”. This is despite the fact that my name ONLY appears deep inside their site in a couple of comments on blog posts I wrote three years ago. It is also despite a lot of other post about Jonah Stein like SEO Book, a dozen or so speaking engagements with my bio on authoritative sites, Twitter and Facebook profiles and lots of other mentions in the press and the blogosphere.

As with any page that is only ranking based on back links, a quick glance at the cache confirms that the words are not on the page.

These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: jonah stein

The challenging part of this type of mini bombing is how difficult is it to undo once you have generated any buzz at a company. I have contacted everyone I could find with my name linking to Alchemist Media and one exception, they have updated the links (Hi Matt) The 15 remaining links showing in OpenSiteExplorer.org with the anchor text of “Jonah Stein” still pointing to Alchemist Media are all obviously scraped copies of the SEOMoz Ranking Factors Version 2 that are not even in English. The only thing on these pages in English are the names of the SEOs who participated. The moral of this story is that even if you are a professional SEO, your name belongs to Google.

Update: Neither Yahoo or Bing rank Alchemist on page 1 or 2 for my name. On the other hand, neither of them have ItsTheROI in first place. Yahoo doesn’t even have me on page 1 or 2!

Filed Under: Google

March 5, 2010 by Jonah Stein 2 Comments

Why Do We Care About Pagerank

Tweet

SEO’s frequently talk about PageRank (not Page Rank).  To prove we aren’t noobies, we quickly add that PR is not important anymore and to stop thinking of it as magical green pixie dust™.  While other external signals are just as important and ToolBar PageRank (TBPR) doesn’t represent the actual value Google puts on a page, there are some assumptions about PageRank that I think we can all agree on — at least until Google changes the rules on us.

  1. Pagerank is still the most meaningful indexation metric
  2. Higher PR is better than lower PR within a domain
  3. PR0 is better than graybar
  4. Graybar PR ~ supplemental index
  5. If the URL you are viewing is not the canonical URL, the PageRank will not match.  You can see the canonical URL by viewing the Google Cache
  6. If your page in not showing as cached in the index, it is not going to rank

If you are not familiar with what PageRank is or want to learn more about, read Danny Sullivan’s excellent, frequently updated and exhaustive (exhausting?) guide to PageRank, which he explains nicely:

Let’s start with what Google says. In a nutshell, it considers links to be like votes. In addition, it considers that some votes are more important than others. PageRank is Google’s system of counting link votes and determining which pages are most important based on them. These scores are then used along with many other things to determine if a page will rank well in a search.

™2005 Greg Boser, 3Dog Media

Filed Under: Google

February 26, 2010 by Jonah Stein 19 Comments

Is Google Cloaking Results to Firefox Users?

Tweet

I discovered this morning that Google isseems to be cloaking results for some users based on either your browser ID user agent or possibly based on the extensions you are running in Firefox.

Like many search marketers, I frequently use Google custom queries.  By far, the most common query I use is the site: command which shows the pages from a particular domain or folder within a domain.   While preparing for SMX next week, I have been researching the effect of pagination and trying to demonstrate whether or not paginated pages are in the index. 

I am doing a case study for my clients, GreatSchools.org, examining their San Francisco Preschools ratings.  In order to see if any of the paginated pages are in the index, I search for “site:www.greatschools.org/ inurl:p=2”

When I run this search using Firefox, I get the following results:

Site: command with Firefox
Site command with Firefox

When I repeat this query on Chrome, I see VERY different results.  So, it looks like Google is cloaking results for Firefox Users.

Update: 11:11 AM: The is some debate about whether changing content based on a browser user agent detection is really cloaking. I may be mixing my euphemisms, but I wouldn’t want to be making that distinction in a Google re-inclusion request. The impact of this is on regular users is slight virtually non-existent, but it looks like if this is not an isolated bug, professional SEO’s are going to have to start using Chrome on occasion (the good news is that Safari seems unaffected). If anyone wants to test this with a clean version of Firefox that doesn’t have any SEO extensions, let me know what you get. Maybe this is only because I have the SEOBook Toolbar and/or SEO For Firefox installed.

Update 2:01 PM: Commenters are reporting that some people confirm my results while others are seeing the same thing in FireFox and Chrome. This leads to an open debate about whether they are “personalizing” Site: results, showing different results based on IP/browse history, etc., or just screwing with me because I am a “known” SEO.

Updated 3/3/10: Confirmed that this is not a personalization issue with Byran Hordling, lead engineer on Google Personalization.

Update: 2/27/10, 1:30 PM. Michael VanDeMar pointed out that the pagination pages are being excluded by the Robots.txt. This explains the lack of metadata being shown, but does nothing to address why Chrome & Safari show different results from IE.

Filed Under: Google

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 7
  • Next Page »

Topics

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Measuring ROI
  • Punditry
  • Random Thoughts
  • RANT
  • Search Engine Marketing
  • Speaking

recent

  • Think Like a Search Engine: SMX West 2016
  • UnGagged Las Vegas 11-9-2015
  • Performance Marketing Summit
  • Building Your Hummingbird Feeder
  • July Search Quality Updates

Intent Focused SEM

SEO and Pay Per Click landing pages should almost always be designed with the same content and the same layout because search engines reward on-page and on-site factors by trying to emulate human users as they crawl the page and navigate the

Copyright © 2023 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in